State Farm’s Prop. 104 Aid OKd
- Share via
A Superior Court judge, citing the free speech rights of corporations, declined today to issue an order that would have prohibited State Farm Insurance Co. from further campaign contributions to a no-fault auto insurance measure on the Nov. 8 ballot.
Judge Barnet Cooperman refused to grant a preliminary injunction sought in a class-action suit filed on behalf of a State Farm policyholder who contends that the nation’s largest auto insurance company has no right to use funds derived from premiums for campaign contributions. A temporary restraining order from Cooperman on Aug. 16 froze more than $2 million in campaign funds already contributed by State Farm to the insurance-backed Proposition 104.
More to Read
Get the L.A. Times Politics newsletter
Deeply reported insights into legislation, politics and policy from Sacramento, Washington and beyond. In your inbox twice per week.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.