It’s ‘Whatever the Market Will Bear’
- Share via
In Kenneth R. Harney’s Sept. 25 article entitled “Loan Scams Target Homeowners With Equity,” a mention is made of a certain gentleman who needed $100,000 in cash quickly. In other words, time was of the essence. It was mentioned that the net fee for this quick cash, which came out of, presumable, a secondary mortgage against his home, initially came to $25,000, thus requiring him to ultimately pay back a total of $125,000 for the privilege of borrowing $100,000 in a real big hurry.
What is inherently wrong with this? Why does this transaction fall under the heading of “scam?”
The fact of the matter is that this gentleman needed that $100,000 in cash right then and there. Furthermore, a number of types of transactions are exempt from usury laws.
For example, broker-arranged loans are exempt. In the example cited in the article, it appears that that loan was broker-arranged. The standard on exempt transactions is “whatever the market will bear.” In that case, that market dictated the terms of that loan. I see nothing illegal or improper about it, based on the facts as presented.
VICKI M. ROBERTS
West Los Angeles
The writer is an attorney.
Inside the business of entertainment
The Wide Shot brings you news, analysis and insights on everything from streaming wars to production — and what it all means for the future.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.
