Campaign Funds
- Share via
Your Feb. 4 front-page article, “Governor Race Set Spending Record,” was enlightening. The $118 million spent on the campaign and the millions spent on those impossible-to-decipher propositions are a waste of money.
When I saw the article’s accompanying information box and its subheading, “What $118 million will buy,” I assumed the researchers would offer some perspective. Instead, I was horrified to see the trite comparisons: a seven-year contract for Shaquille O’Neal; the cost of producing “Lethal Weapon 4”; or the 1997 Dodgers and Angels payrolls.
How about some real issues? The $118 million would buy a yearlong stay in a nursing home for 2,700 people; a year’s worth of rent in a two-bedroom apartment for 13,129 Los Angeles households; a gallon of milk for every person in California; a used car for every household in Culver City; or one or two weeks of groceries for every person in the city of Los Angeles. Perspective please!
CAROLINE CICERO
Culver City
Get the L.A. Times Politics newsletter
Deeply reported insights into legislation, politics and policy from Sacramento, Washington and beyond. In your inbox twice per week.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.
